← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/30718/2025disposed of

Saravanamurugan v. The Tahsildar

2025-10-30Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.10.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No.30718 of 2025 Saravanamurugan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

2.The Head Surveyor, Office of the Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thirupachethy Police Station, Sivagangai District.

4.Murugesan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to survey the land in connection with old Survey No.85, new natham Survey Nos.231/11, 231/14, to an extent of 0.57 Hectares situated at Thirupachethy North Group, Thirupachethy, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District with police protection at the time of survey the land by considering the petitioner's online application 1/5

No.2025/N123/23/007048 dated 09.06.2025 and the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2025 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

By relying on a sale deed dated 14.05.2025 and patta No.1349, the petitioner had applied online on 09.06.2025 for a survey of land in survey Nos.231/11 and 231/14. The present Writ Petition relates thereto.

2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice for the third respondent. In the affidavit in support of this Writ Petition, it is stated that the fourth respondent, who is not connected with the property, has attempted to disturb the petitioner's possession thereof.

3. In view thereof, the Tahsildar should issue notice to the fourth 2/5

respondent and consider his objections before taking a decision. On account of this direction, it is unnecessary to issue notice to the fourth respondent in this Writ Petition.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the first and second respondents to initiate action on the petitioner's request for a survey after issuing notice to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and owners of relevant adjacent lands. A decision shall be taken after considering objections, if any, from them. The entire process shall be concluded within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. For avoidance of doubt, it is made clear that the parties should be relegated to the jurisdictional civil court if there is a credible title dispute. On the other hand, a boundary dispute may be decided by the revenue officials. No costs.

NCS : Yes/No 30.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd 3/5

To 1.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

2.The Head Surveyor, Office of the Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thirupachethy Police Station, Sivagangai District.

4/5

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.

apd ORDER MADE IN 30.10.2025 5/5