← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19018/2025dismissed

K.S.Mani v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By

2025-11-18Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18.11.2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.19018 of 2025 K.S.Mani, S/o.Sivanu ... Petitioner/de-facto complainant Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu represented by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District.

(Crime No.553 of 2025) ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant 2.Senthilkumar ... 2nd Respondent/ Accused For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sasi Kumar, Advocate For R1 : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : M/s.A.Dharani, Advocate PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL Under Sec.483(3) of BNSS. 1/4

PRAYER :- To cancel the order of bail made in Cr.M.P.No.577 of 2025 dated 07.10.2025 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri.

ORDER: The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to cancel the bail granted to the 2nd respondent herein/accused in Cr.M.P.No.577 of 2025 by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri on 07.10.2025.

2. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the 2nd respondent police.

3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner/de-facto complainant that, while the learned trial Judge was hearing the 2nd respondent/accused's bail application on 07.10.2025, it was incorrectly reported before the Court that the injured had been discharged from the hospital. However, the injured was actually discharged only on 09.10.2025.

4. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted that the 2nd respondent herein/accused has not violated any of the conditions imposed by the trial Court. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of this petition. 2/4

5. Considering the fact that the contention of the de-facto complainant is on flimsy ground, the present petition seeking cancellation of bail is not liable to be considered.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 18.11.2025 mkn To 1.The Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY, J.

mkn

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19018 of 2025 Date : 18.11.2025 4/4