← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/31009/2025disposed of

M.Boopathyraj v. The State Of Tamilnadu Represented By

2025-11-03Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Boopathyraj ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State represented by The Inspector General, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC), Southern Range, M.K.N. Road, Alandur, Chennai - 600 016.

3.The District Registrar (Administration), TNAU Nagar, Rajagambeeram, Othakadai, Madurai District - 625 107.

4.The Sub Registrar, Madurai South Joint - 4, Madurai.

1/5

5.U.Senthilkumar ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to complete the enquiry based on the first respondent Letter No.12830/R1/2025 dated 01.04.2025 and based on petitioner's representation (in person) dated 15.10.2025 within a specific period as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader for R.1, R.3 & R.4 Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R.2

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The petitioner is an office bearer of the petition mentioned Trust. He alleges that certain documents executed in the name of the Trust by one Chandrabose were fraudulently registered. According to him, the registering authority has taken illegal gratification for registering the documents. In this regard, complaint was lodged and reports were also called for.

2/5

3.These are not matters in which this writ Court, exercising its writ jurisdiction, would be justified in issuing any direction. The writ petitioner has made specific allegation and the Head of the Department is already cognizant of the same. It is for the Head of the Department to take appropriate action as per law. I do not issue any direction as such. If according to the writ petitioner some criminal activity had taken place, it is open to the writ petitioner to invoke the procedure set out in the penal laws.

4.Granting such liberty to the writ petitioner and leaving the matter to the discretion of the Head of the Department, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

03.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA To 1.The Inspector General, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028. 3/5

2.The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC), Southern Range, M.K.N. Road, Alandur, Chennai - 600 016.

3.The District Registrar (Administration), TNAU Nagar, Rajagambeeram, Othakadai, Madurai District - 625 107.

4.The Sub Registrar, Madurai South Joint - 4, Madurai.

4/5

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

MGA 03.11.2025 5/5