Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14855/2013disposed of

A. Venkatesh, v. The Secretary To Govt.,

2015-06-18Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.06.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P(MD)No.14855 of 2013 A.Venkatesh ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Secretary to the Government, Home Department (Police), Chief Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chenni-9.

2.The Director General of Police (D.G.P), Tamil Nadu Police Department, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4 3.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

4.The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kottar, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

5.R.Bharath Lingam 6.T.Balakrishnan, 7.M.Balaji 8.Ramesh @ Maadan 9.Mohan ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st to 3rd respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 5th and 6th respondents based on the representation of the Petitioner dated 12.08.2013.

For Petitioner : Mr.L.George Paul Anto For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate For Respondents 5 & 6 : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh

O R D E R

Petitioner is a practising advocate and he has given a complaint dated 12.08.2013 to the respondents 1 to 3, alleging action against the respondents 5 & 6 for their favourable action https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

towards the seventh and eighth respondents. But no steps have been taken till now. Hence, the petitioner is before this court with this Writ Petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and perused the records carefully.

3. Perusal of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the fifth respondent shows that the allegations made by the petitioner were denied by him. This court is not willing to go into the allegations as well as the denial. As the representation of the petitioner dated 12.08.2013 is yet to be disposed of, without going into the merits, the third respondent is directed to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to the Government, Home Department (Police), Chief Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chenni-9.

2.The Director General of Police (D.G.P), Tamil Nadu Police Department, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4 3.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

4.The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kottar, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

+One cc tol M/s.L.George Paul Anto, Advocate, SR.no.32478 PJL RL/6 c-30/6/2015 W.P(MD)No.14855 of 2013 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 18.06.2015