Madras High CourtCMP(MD)/17748/2025allowed

Gandhi Alias Selvam, v. Pappammal (Died) 1. Vijayalakshmi

2026-03-10Honourable Mr Justice P.Vadamalai5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI IN AS(MD) NO. 31 of 2017 Gandhi @ Selvam Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs Pappammal (Died) 1.Vijayalakshmi 2.Baskar @ Ganesan Kanakavalli (Died) 3.Indira 4.Priyankadevi 5.Ishwariya (The 4th and 5th Respondents are declared as majors and they are amended as per order in IA 120 of dated 08.08.2014) Mailammal (Died) 1/5

6.Lakshmi (Died) 7.Bose @ Palanisamy (Died) 8.Subbalakshmi (Died) 9.Nagarajan 10.Karthikeyan 11.Shanmugavel 12.Durgadevi 13.Kumaravel @ Appu 14.P.Santhi 15.P.Selvakalai 16.P.Ramyarevathi 17.P.Shanmugavel Chettiar 18.S.Renuka 19.Gnana Kalai Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions :

Mr.B.Jameelarasu, Advocate For Respondent(s) in all petitions :

Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate for R17 & R18 R19 - No Appearance 2/5

Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed to condone the delay of 354 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, and to bring on record respondent Nos.17 to 19 as the legal representatives of the deceased 8th respondent and rank them as respondent Nos.17 to 19 in the Appeal Suit in A.S. (MD)No.31 of 2017 on the file of this Court.

COMMON

ORDER

These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 354 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, and to bring on record respondent Nos.17 to 19 as the legal representatives of the deceased 8th respondent and rank them as respondent Nos.17 to 19 in the Appeal Suit in A.S. (MD)No.31 of 2017 on the file of this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions. 3/5

3. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.17 & 18 has not raised any objection to this petition.

4. The names of the 19th respondent has been printed in the cause list.

5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.

10-03-2026 (3/3) Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum.

mkn 4/5

P.VADAMALAI, J.

mkn in AS(MD) NO. 31 of 2017 10.03.2026 (3/3) 5/5