Magesh v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10.02.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.19169 of 2025 Magesh ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Kanniyakumari District.

(Crime No.543 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karkki Kannan For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.543 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/7

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465 and 468 of IPC, in Crime No.543 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as Senior Manager at the State Bank of India General Insurance Company. The petitioner had insured his two-wheeler; however, he furnished the registration number of his four-wheeler. Subsequently, the four-wheeler met with an accident, and the petitioner claimed compensation. Based on these allegations, the FIR was registered against the petitioner. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2/7

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner insured his two-wheeler using the registration number of his four-wheeler and later claimed compensation after the four-wheeler met with an accident. Therefore, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court directed the Investigation Officer whether the present crime is a single incident or there are several incident. It is reported more than 7 incident happened and all the complaints were taken appropriate action. The said statement is recorded. As far as the present petition is concerned, since the petitioner has complied with the condition imposed in the interim anticipatory bail regularly, the interim anticipatory bail already granted is made absolute and this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, this Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Eraniel, 3/7

Kanniyakumari District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), to the credit of Crime No.543 of 2025 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanniyakumari District. After receipt of entire amount, the learned Judicial Magistrate, shall deposit the said amount in an interest bearing Fixed Deposit in any Nationalized Bank initially for a period of one year and renew them periodically until the final order/Judgment is passed in the case in Crime No. 543 of 2025. The learned Judicial Magistrate or Trial Court shall pass orders regarding entitlement of the said amount in its final order/Judgment. (c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. He has to 4/7

co-operate for the investigation;

(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.

(S S Y J) 10.02.2026 jbr 5/7

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanniyakumari District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Kanniyakumari District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

6/7

S.SRIMATHY,J.

jbr

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19169 of 2025 Date : 10.02.2026 7/7