Vigneshwaran @ Vicki v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thoothukudi South

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04.11.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.19347 of 2025 Vigneshwaran @ Vicki .. Petitioner/ Accused No.6 Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi South Police Station, (Crime No.622 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arun Ramnath For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.622 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioner/A6, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) of BNS, 2023, corresponding Section 302 IPC, in Crime No.622 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased scolded and slapped the 1st accused on 18.08.2025. In order to wreck out vengeance, all the accused have planned and murdered the deceased on 20.08.2025. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the case, a false case has been lodged as against the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 02.09.2025. Hence, he seeks bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that there is one previous case against the 2/6

petitioner. He further submitted that there is no specific overtact against the petitioner. However, he objected to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and since there is no specific overtact against the petitioner, and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thoothukudi, and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

3/6

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

04.11.2025 PJL To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, 4/6

2. The Superintendent, District Jail, Peraorani, Thoothukudi District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi South Police Station,

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY, J.

PJL

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19347 of 2025 Date : 04.11.2025 6/6