Govindaraju v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Peraiyur
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/11/2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Govindaraju ... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Station, Madurai District, Crime No.133/2025.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananda Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.133/2025 on the file of the respondent police 1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), and 132 of BNS, 2023, in Crime No. 133 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 18.09.2025 at about 12.30 p.m., during the inspection, the petitioner objected, stopped the officer from questioning nearby people, abused in filthy language and threatened him. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 2/6
respondent Police submits that during the inspection, the petitioner objected, stopped the officer from questioning nearby people, abused in filthy language and threatened him
5. The contention of the petitioner that the inspecting officer was required to conduct a surprise inspection without prior notice. However, since the inspection was pre-informed, the hospital was opened and the waste was removed. The petitioner's complaint was rendered ineffective, and he questioned the same. Considering the above said facts and also considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, this Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends 3/6
to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:
(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; (c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
4/6
(f) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.
(S S Y J) 04.11.2025 jbr TO
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur.
2. The Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Station, Madurai District,
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J jbr
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19348 of 2025 Date : 04/11/2025 6/6