A. Navaneetha Krishnan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Elayirampannai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05/11/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY 1.A.Navaneetha Krishnan, S/o.P.R.Ayyalusamy 2.Gurunathan, S/o.Subbiah ... Petitioners Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Elayirampannai Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
(Crime No.210 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.Jagadeeshwaran R, Advocate For Respondent : Ms.M.Aasha, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.210 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.
1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w. Sections 4(1)(1A) and 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.210 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners transported 6 unit of Jalli stones in a lorry bearing Registration No.KA 51 AH 0369without valid transit pass. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have a valid transit pass and they are innocent persons and have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution, and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioners.
2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioners have no previous cases. However, she opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioners have valid transit pass and also considering the fact that the petitioners have no previous cases, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sattur, Viruthunagar District, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar 3/6
card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required, and when they appear before the respondent police, the petitioners are directed to produce the valid transit pass before the respondent police;
[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and 4/6
[f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
05.11.2025 PJL To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sattur, Viruthunagar District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Elayirampannai Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J PJL
ORDER
IN 05.11.2025 6/6