T.P.Ali Akbar, v. Tangedco

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.17882 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 T.P.Ali Akbar ... Petitioner vs.

TANGEDCO rep.by its Executive Engineer Office of the Executive Engineer Distribution / Nagercoil Kanyakumari District ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order bearing Memo No.7029/7029/Adm./A.dm Sup/F.con/2013 dated 18.10.2013 passed by the respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondent : Mr.A.U.Ramanathan

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

sd/ Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar +1 CC to MR.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ, Advocate ( SR-67212[F] dated 06/06/2019 ) +1 CC to MR.A.U.RAMANATHAN, Advocate ( SR-67227[F] dated 06/06/2019 ) W.P.(MD) No.17882 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 04.06.2019 KRK MK (13.06.2019) 1P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/