R. Gnanamani, v. The Chief Engineer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.1795 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2013 R.Gnanamani ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Chief Engineer (Distribution), Chief Engineer Office, Trichy.

2. The Additional Chief Engineer, Pudukottai Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO Ltd., Pudukottai.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order vide. F.M.vz.017337/ ep.g.g./g.1-2011 dated 09.11.2012 passed by the first respondent confirming the order dated 25.05.2012 made in F/M/vz;/11295/326/ep/gp1/c3-nfh/x-11 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to retain the petitioner as Inspector of Assessment with all consequential benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondents : Mr.S.Dhayalan Government Advocate

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner made a submission that the writ petitioner has passed away and he could not able to secure any further instruction to get along with the case. 2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

sd/ Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

To

1. The Chief Engineer (Distribution), Chief Engineer Office, Trichy.

2. The Additional Chief Engineer, Pudukottai Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO Ltd., Pudukottai.

+1 CC to MR.S.DHAYALAN, Advocate ( SR-67230[F] dated 06/06/2019 ) +1 CC to MR.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ, Advocate ( SR-66883[F] dated 04/06/2019 ) W.P.(MD)No.1795 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2013 03.06.2019 PNN MK (14.06.2019) 3P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/