Samuthiram v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps-Tirunelveli

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06.11.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Samuthiram . ..Petitioner/ Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Rural, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.61 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.61 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/4

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 332(B), 318(2), 64(2)(K) and 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.61 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail,

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is a married man and by falsely promised to the daughter of the defacto complainant and sexual intercourse with her, due to which she became 7 months pregnant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has involved in very serious offence and the 2/4

investigation is still pending. Hence, he objected to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has involved in very serious offence and the investigation is at initial stage. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. (S S Y J) 06.11.2025 msrm To 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Rural, Tirunelveli District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY,J msrm

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19552 of 2025 06.11.2025 4/4