Parameswaran v. The Assistant Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.9637 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Parameswaran : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Door No.28/29, Pandian Nagar, 2nd Street, Dindigul District.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

3.The Inspector of Police, Pattiveeranpatti, Dindigul.

4.S.T.Vellaichamy : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take effective steps to control and manage the Arulmigu Periyamuthalamman Temple, Ayyampalayam, Dindigul District through the committee consisting of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh For Respondents 1to3 : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, Government Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr.S.Manohar

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Door No.28/29, Pandian Nagar, 2nd Street, Dindigul District.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

3.The Inspector of Police, Pattiveeranpatti, Dindigul.

+1cc to Mr.S.Manohar, Advocate SR.No.50411 +1cc to Special Government Pleader SR.No.50175 SML sm:SKS-RR:19/09/2016:2P/6C Order made in W.P.(MD)No.9637 of 2011 Dated: 02.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/