Yesuraja v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/11/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Yesuraja, S/o.Rathinam ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli City.
(Crime No.382 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Edward Raja, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.382 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6
The petitioner/Sole Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 351(2), and 232 of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.382 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner threatened the defacto complainant, who is the witness in the case pending against the petitioner, over phone. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has intimidated the witness in another case, where the petitioner is also an accused. He further submitted that already 2/6
anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner by the lower Court. But the same was lapsed, hence, the present petition was filed by the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner is having three previous cases. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the lower Court has already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to same conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond 3/6
and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
07.11.2025 PJL 4/6
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli.
2.The Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli City.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J PJL
ORDER
IN 07.11.2025 6/6