← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19670/2025granted

Ayyadurai v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pattukottai Town Police Station ,

2025-11-17Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17.11.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.19670 of 2025 Ayyadurai ... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.670 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arun Prasad For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER:- For Bail in Crime No.670 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 232, 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.670 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

1/4

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is alleged to have threatened the defacto complainant not to depose evidence against him in a murder case. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 22.10.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the specific overtact against the petitioner is he has threatened the defacto complainant not to depose evidence against him in a murder case. Further he submitted that the defacto complainant has deposed the evidence on 17.11.2025. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and since the defacto complainant has deposed evidence before the trial Court, and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject 2/4

to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur, and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance 3/4

S.SRIMATHY,J.

PJL with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

17.11.2025 PJL To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur,

2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Thanjavur.

3. The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Thanjavur District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No.19670 of 2025 4/4