← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/32037/2025dismissed

The Commissioner v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

2025-11-12Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.25223 of 2025 The Commissioner, Dindigul City Municipal Corporation, Dindigul.

... Petitioner Vs.

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Income Tax Office, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Central Revenue Buildings, Bibikulam, Madurai -625 002.

... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Impugned Demand Notice dated 03.06.2025 on the file of the Respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, Standing Counsel.

1/4

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.Dindigul City Municipal Corporation is the petitioner herein. They challenge the impugned intimation made by the Income Tax Department.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the statute has prescribed limitation of seven years, the authority cannot make a demand for any period prior to that.

4.I am not swayed by the said submission. As rightly pointed out by the learned standing counsel, what is under challenge is a mere intimation and it is not an order as such. It is seen that assessment orders have already been passed against the local body. Without challenging those primary orders, assailing the consequential demands is not maintainable.

2/4

5.I must express my shock that a State Instrumentality has failed to discharge its statutory obligations. Deducting tax at source is a statutory mandate. In some cases, this duty has not been discharged. In many other cases, deducted tax amount was not remitted. This will amount to rank misappropriation. I only hope that the house is set in order as expeditiously as possible.

6.Granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the primary assessment orders, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12.11.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias 3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 12.11.2025 4/4