Sbk Higher Secondary School v. The Chief Educational Officer
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD)No.31886 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)No.25074 of 2025 SBK Higher Secondary School, Rep by its Secretary, C.Manivannan, Kalloorani, Aruppukkottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
...Petitioner
Vs 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District.
2.The District Educational Officer (Secondary), Virudhunagar District.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the orders passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.03709/A6/2025 dated 22.10.2025 and the consequential order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings O.Mu.No.3006/A2/2025 dated 28.10.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to approve the promotion of 1/5
Tmt.G.Vanitha as P.G.Assistant (Physics) with effect from 14.03.2025 with all other consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the orders passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.03709/A6/2025 dated 22.10.2025 and the consequential order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings O.Mu.No.3006/A2/2025 dated 28.10.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to approve the promotion of Tmt.G.Vanitha as P.G.Assistant (Physics) with effect from 14.03.2025 with all other consequential benefits.
2.The proposal sent by the petitioner School for approval of the promotion granted to the P.G.Assistant had been returned to find out whether any appeal had been filed against the order passed by this Court 2/5
in W.P(MD)No.11994 of 2025 and also to obtain a legal opinion from the Court.
3.The order passed in W.P(MD)No.11994 of 2024 relates to the Society of which the petitioner School is an Educational Agency. The dispute between the Society cannot be put against the School, as the School is being managed by the School Committee approved by the respondent.
4. It is also made clear that this Court does not give any opinion. The reasons attributed in the order impugned are very innocuous. Accordingly, the impugned orders are set aside and the matter is remitted back to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's proposal on merits and in accordance with law without being influenced by the dispute in the Society. Such exercise shall be completed by the first respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
3/5
5. The writ petition stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10.11.2025 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Sn To:
1.The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District.
2.The District Educational Officer (Secondary), Virudhunagar District.
4/5
K.KUMARESH BABU , J.
Sn 10.11.2025 5/5