Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3961/2013dismissed

G. Jeyachitra, v. The Superintendent Of

2018-02-08Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.02.2018 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN WP (MD) No.3961 of 2013 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2013 G.Jeyachitra ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Tuticorin District.

3. Murugesan Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Tuticorin District.

4. Ravi Narayanan Sub Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Tuticoroin District.

5. Sangunathan

6. Joseph (Respondents 3 to 6 impleaded vide order dated 08.02.2018) ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering in the civil dispute of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For R1 & R2 : Mr.Aayiram K.Senthil kumar Additional Government Pleader For R5 and R6 : Mr.Poornachandran for Mr.S.Pon Senthilkumaran

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute between the parties.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.According to the petitioner, she has got decree from the civil Court in O.S.No.11 of 2007 and for executing of decree,

she has filed E.P.No.33 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti and based on the order passed in the above execution petition, possession of the property was handed over to the petitioner. Subsequently, the second respondent, Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, threatened the petitioner to hand over possession to third parties. In the above circumstances, this writ petition has been filed. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that possession of the property in dispute is still with the petitioner and the concerned Inspector of Police has been transferred from the above police station.

4.In view of the above submission, nothing survives in the petition for adjudication. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. However, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned as and when occasion arises. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Tuticorin District.

+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.47458 +1cc to Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Advocate Sr.No.47401 MJ VB/CVC/SAR1/28.02.2018/2P/5C WP(MD)No.3961 of 2013 08.02.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/