← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20053/2025dismissed

Kantha Kumar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sathankulam

2025-11-13Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/11/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Kantha Kumar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

(Crime No.211 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.211 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/4

The petitioner/sole accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 351(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w. Sections 5(l), 5(o), and 6 of POCSO Act, 2019, in Crime No.211 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant's sister's son is studying in Ranji Aron Higher Secondary School and he is staying in Arasinar Students Hostel. When the defacto complainant and his sister went to the hostel to see her son/victim, he walked differently and unable to move properly, at that time, the defacto complainant questioned about it and he came to know that the hostel watchman/petitioner herein had committed sexual assault upon the victim. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks 2/4

bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced the 164 statement of the victim boy, and he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of offence and after reading the 164 statement of the victim, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

13.11.2025 PJL To 1.The Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY,J PJL

ORDER

IN 13.11.2025 4/4