Yuvarajkumar (Yurvaraj) @ Uvarajkumar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dindigul Taluk

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 20141 of 2025 Yuvarajkumar (Yurvaraj) @ Uvarajkumar

...Petitioner

Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.556 of 2025)

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manikandan Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 556 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.10.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2) and 311 of BNS and 25(1A) Arms Act and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime 1/6

No.556 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 12.10.2025, at 08.45 p.m, the accused along with other accused restrained the Mini Bus with deadly weapons, caused damages to the bus windows and robbed Rs.15,000/- from the conductor of the bus and one cell phone from one passenger. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner is not present in the scene of occurrence. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the offence are grave in nature. The petitioner along with other accused persons wrongfully intercepted the Mini Bus and robbed Rs. 15,000/- and a Cell phone. They also caused damages to the Bus. A1 and A2 are still in custody. The petitioner has 21 previous cases. Hence, he vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on 2/6

record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner, the alleged occurrence is took place in the year 2025, though the petitioner has so many previous cases, all are not similar kind of offence and in all those case the petitioner was granted bail and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 13.10.2025, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, at 10.30 a.m., on all working days, until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;

3/6

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 20.04.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.556 of 2025) 4/6

3.The Superintendent, District Prison, Dindigul. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL, J.

TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 20141 of 2025 Date : 20.04.2026 6/6