← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21445/2025allowed

G.Ganesan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, K.Pudur

2025-11-28Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.18462 of 2025 G.Ganesan, ... Petitioner Vs.

1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, K.Pudur, Police Station, Madurai District.

Crime No. 289/2010.

2. Jayaveeran ... Respondents PRAYER :- This petition under section 528 BNSS, to call for the entire records relating to the Impugned Charge Sheet in C.C. No. 33 of 2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No. VI, Madurai and to quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Vidhya Sagar, For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr.M.Vasanth for R2 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned final report filed for the offences under Sections 341, 324, 506(ii) I.P.C (corresponding to Sections 126, 118(1), 351 (3) BNS).

2. The gist of the allegation is that on account of prior enmity, the petitioner had attacked the defacto complainant with hands and abused him in filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner and the second respondent belong to same village and they have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 25.11.2025.

4. The petitioner and the defacto complainant are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.S.Palanivelu, Special Sub Inspector of Police, E1-Pudur Police Station, Madurai District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them. 2/4

5. Considering the nature of the allegation and the compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending trial. Accordingly, the impugned final report is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 25.11.2025, shall form part and parcel of the order. The petitioner shall pay a cost of Rs.5,000/- to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

28.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No LS TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate No. VI, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, K.Pudur Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

SUNDER MOHAN,J LS 4.The Officer in-charge, Mediation and Conciliation Centre Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No.21445 of 2025 28.11.2025 4/4