Seethalakshmi v. The Inspector General Of Registration
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.25835 of 2025 Seethalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinampakkam, Santhome, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai.
2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.
3.The Sub Registrar, Thiruppuvanam Sub Registrar Office, Sivagangai District.
4.K.Pari 5.P.Jeyaseetharaman 6.Pon Eswara Moorthy 7.S.Kamatchi @ Kameshwaran ... Respondents 1/6
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 3 to register the order passed by this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.15341 of 2025 dated 26.08.2025 and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai in Na.Ka.A3/7825/2024 dated 12.05.2025 in the registers maintained by the 3rd Respondent under Section 116(a) of the Tamil Nadu Registration Act and to refrain from registering any documents in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.42/2 to an extent of 4 Acres 50 Cents, situated at Kothankulam North, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalamutharasu, For Mr.T.Indrachithu For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3.
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3. Issuance of notice to the respondents 4 to 7 is dispensed with.
2/6
2.The only request made by the writ petitioner is that the petition mentioned writ order (W.P.(MD)No.15341 of 2025) dated 26.08.2025 has to be registered.
3.The learned Additional Government Pleader raised two fold objections. The first objection is that only Civil Court's decree can be registered. The second objection is that there is nothing on record to show that the writ order has become final.
4.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order of this Court had not been put to challenge. He would add that when a Civil Court's decree can be registered, there cannot be any objection for registering the order of the Writ Court. I find force in the said contention. 5.The third respondent is directed to register the petition mentioned writ order. The petitioner shall appear before the third respondent and present certified copy of the writ order and the same shall be so registered so that it is reflected in the encumbrance register. 3/6
6.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 14.11.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:
1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinampakkam, Santhome, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai.
2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.
3.The Sub Registrar, Thiruppuvanam Sub Registrar Office, Sivagangai District.
4/6
5/6
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
ias 14.11.2025 6/6