Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7328/2013disposed of

V.Muthukaruppan v. The District Collector

2017-11-30Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.7328 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 V.Muthukaruppan .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, New Palace, Pudukkottai - 622 005.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the Collectorate, New Palace, Pudukkottai - 622 005.

3. The Tahsildar, Illuppur, Pudukkottai District.

4. Alagappan

5. Ulaganatha Thevar

6. Veeraiah

7. Chinna Thambi .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to carryout and include the name of the petitioner in computer chitta for patta No.48 at Kurukkapatti Village, Pudukkottai District by giving effect to the orders of the second respondent in Mu.Mu.35437/87, dated 10.09.1988. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Baalasundharam For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthaiah, Government Advocate.

For Respondents 4 to 7 : Mr.N.Balakrishnan

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to carryout and include the name of the petitioner in computer chitta for patta No.48 at Kurukkapatti Village, Pudukkottai District, based on the orders of the second respondent in Mu.Mu.35437/87, dated 10.09.1988. 2.Heard both sides.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner made a

representation, dated 26.05.2006, to the Jamapandhi Officer of the second respondent, seeking to include his name in the computer chitta for patta No.48, Kurukkapatti Village, Pudukkottai District. In the revision petition filed by one Alagappan, the second respondent also passed an order, dated 10.09.1988, confirming the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai, with regard to joint patta. Since the third respondent has not complied with the said order, the petitioner is before this Court. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it would be suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 26.05.2006, is directed to be disposed of by the third respondent, on the basis of the order of the second respondent, dated 10.09.1988.

5.Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for, this Court, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, directs the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 26.05.2006, and pass appropriate orders, if not disposed of earlier, on the basis of the order of the second respondent, dated 10.09.1988 and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, New Palace, Pudukkottai - 622 005.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the Collectorate, New Palace, Pudukkottai - 622 005.

3. The Tahsildar, Illuppur, Pudukkottai District.

+ 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 90690 SMN TE/SV-MMS/SAR-4 : 21/12/2017 : 2P/5C ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.7328 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 30.11.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/