Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7601/2013dismissed as infructuous

Vanaja, v. The Cocmmissioner,

2017-11-30Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.11.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.7601 of 2013 Vanaja ... Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner, Trichy City Corporation, Promenade Road, Cantonment, Trichy-1, Trichy District.

... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to grant sanction building plan approval on petitioner's application No.04151 dated 16.09.2011, in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 22.04.2013 within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondent to provide building plan approval, by considering his representation dated 22.04.2013.

2.Heard both sides.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is represented by the learned Counsel on either side that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and nothing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ further survives for adjudication in this matter.

4.Recording such submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Commissioner, Trichy City Corporation, Promenade Road, Cantonment, Trichy-1, Trichy District.

+1cc to M/S.R.SUNDAR, Advocate SR.No.90439.

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.7601 of 2013 dsk SDS/MR:KKR/SAR 1/22.12.2017/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/