Manan @ Veerachamy v. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 19.12.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P(MD)No.7780 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 Manan @ Veerachamy

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

3. The Tahsildar, Palani Taluk, Taluk Office, Dindigul District.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the personal religious right of the Petitioner and also seizing the goddess Veeramathiamman from the custody of the Petitioner based on the Petitioner's representation dated 23.4.2013.

For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents :

Mr.T.R.Janarthanan 1 to 3 Addl.Govt.Pleader

ORDER

When the matter was called on 5.12.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal''.Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution . Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/ Deputy Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

3. The Tahsildar, Palani Taluk, Taluk Office, Dindigul District.

W.P(MD)No.7780 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 19.12.2016 vsn msm-em-mpa/05.01.17/p2/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/