Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9327/2013disposed of

A. Karuppasamy, v. The Managing Director

2016-11-07Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Writ Petition (MD) No.9327 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 A. Karuppasamy, ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Managing Director, Government Cable T.V., No.11/22, Mangadu Samy Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 031.

2. The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Government Cable T.V., Madurai.

3. R.Ananthavel ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Writ directing the respondents 1 & 2 to take suitable action on my representation submitted by the petitioner on 17.05.2013 and also to pass such other and further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper on the facts and circumstances of the case.

For Petitioner : Mr.K. Manikandan For Respondents : Mr.Abdul Saleem for Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar for R-1 & 2 Mr. S. Ramasamy for R3

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to take suitable action on his representation, dated, 17.05.2013 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.According to the petitioner, he is a LCO (Local Cable TV Operator) in Meenambalpuram, Madurai District, under the Arasu Cable TV Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has given a representation to the respondents on 17.05.2013, with regard to fixing of monthly subscription payment based on the number of subscribers. Sofar, the said representation has not been considered by the respondents. Hence, he has filed the present writ petition.

3.Mr.Abdul Saleem, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2/Arasu Cable TV Corporation submitted that they are ready and willing to consider the petitioner's representation within a time limit prescribed by this Court. 4.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2, the respondents 1 & 2 are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.05.2013, after giving opportunity to the petitioner as well as any rival claimant, if any, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar vs +1cc to Mr.S.Ramasamy,Advocate Sr.No. 60536 JAM/08.12.16/CK/SAR i/2p-2c W.P(MD)No.9327 of 2013 07.11.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/