← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21060/2025allowed

Manikandan v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By Its

2025-11-25Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

1. Manikandan,

2. Arun,

3. Udhayakumar,

4. Essakimuthu, ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep By its, the Inspector of Police, Manur Police Station, Tirunelveli District (Crlno.102 of 2025).

2. Satheesh Kumar, ... Respondents PRAYER :- This Petition is filed under section 528 BNSS, to call for the entire records pertaining to the casein C.C.No.867 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelveli District and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.Ashok.S, For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr.S.Vikraman for R2 1/4

ORDER

The petitioners seek to quash the impugned final report filed for the offences under Sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) BNS (Corresponding to Sections 448, 294(b), 324 and 506 (ii) I.P.C.).

2. The gist of the allegation is that on account of business motive, the petitioners had trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, attacked him with hands and abused him in filthy language and threatened with dire consequences.

3. Admittedly, the petitioners and the second respondent belong to same village and they have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 25.11.2025.

4. The petitioners and the defacto complainant are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.S.Mahinabubaskar, Manur Police Station, Tirunelveli District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

2/4

5. Considering the nature of the allegation and the compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending trial. Accordingly, the impugned final report is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 25.11.2025, shall form part and parcel of the order. The petitioners shall jointly pay a cost of Rs.10,000/- to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.

25.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No LS To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Manur Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

SUNDER MOHAN,J LS CRL OP(MD) No.21060 of 2025 25.11.2025 4/4