Balasudarsan v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20.11.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Balasudarsan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,The Inspector of Police, Thirukurungudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.283 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No.283 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 333, 296(b), 131, 309(4) & 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.283 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons had trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and robbed a gold doller of two grams and also cash of Rs. 10,000/- and also damaged the household articles belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 19.10.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

2/6

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there are two previous cases pending against the petitioner and the property has been recovered. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the property has been recovered and the substantial amount has been recovered and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyur, and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

3/6

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 20.11.2025 msrm 4/6

To

1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyur.

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thirukurungudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J.

msrm

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20826 of 2025 Date : 20.11.2025 6/6