← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20863/2025dismissed

Sivaraman v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps-Thiruchendur

2025-11-26Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26.11.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.20863 of 2025 Sivaraman ... Petitioner Vs The State represented by, the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

(Crime No.38 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.38 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.

1/4

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 8, 11(3) r/w Section 12 of POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.38 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the victim girl, aged 17 years, is studying 12th standard. On 24.10.2025, while returning home from school around 6:00 PM, near the Arumuganeri market, the petitioner caught the girl's hand and pulled her. At that time, the accused showed her an obscene image on his mobile phone. The girl got scared and ran to her home. Hence, a case has been registered against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

1. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2.

2/4

5. On perusing the 164 statement, it is seen that the 164 statement completely supports the case of prosecution. The victim girl has clearly stated the occurrence.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence and the specific overt act against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 26.11.2025 TMG TO 1.The Inspector of Police, AWPS Tiruchendur Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY, J.

TMG

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20863 of 2025 Date : 26.11.2025 4/4