V.Rajasekar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dcb
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05.01.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)Nos.21246, 21988, 21693 & 22582 of 2025 V.Rajasekar ... Petitioner/Accused (In Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21246 of 2025) Sasikumar ... Petitioner/Accused (In Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22582 of 2025) D.Shankar ... Petitioner/Accused (In Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21693 of 2025) V.Manikandan ... Petitioner/Accused (In Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21988 of 2025)
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.
(Crime No.12 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant (In all petitions) 1/6
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Muthukumaran (In all petitions) For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl. Side) (In all petitions) For Intervenor : M/s.A.Aishwarya Coroline PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS COMMON PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.12 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.
COMMON ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 468, 471 and 120(b) of IPC, in Crime No.12 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused engaged in fraudulent practices with the intention of defrauding the organization by collecting a specific amount of cash for each loan in exchange for 2/6
providing loans, thereby causing a financial loss of Rs.70,45,469/- to the company. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the accused, by collecting cash for each loan, engaged in fraudulent practices and caused a loss of Rs.70,45,469/- to the company. He further submitted that this Court has already granted interim anticipatory bail directing the petitioners to appear before the respondent police and cooperated with the investigation, and that the petitioners are cooperating with the investigation.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and since the petitioners have regularly complied with the conditions imposed in the interim anticipatory bail, the interim 3/6
anticipatory bail already granted is made absolute and this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, this Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders; 4/6
(c) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.
(S S Y J) 05.01.2026 jbr 5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J.
jbr To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.
2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.21246, 21988, 21693 & 22582 of 2025 Date : 05.01.2026 6/6