← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/34997/2025dismissed

Karbagam Dhavamani v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2025-12-04Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.34997 of 2025 Karbagam Dhavamani ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Rd, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, Office of Pudukkottai District Registration, PWD Campus, Pudukkottai Head Office, Pudukkottai - 622 001.

3. The Sub Registrar, Office of Pudukkottai Sub Registration, PWD Campus, Pudukkottai Head Office, Pudukkottai - 622 001.

4. A.P.Shankaramurthy ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to take appropriate action upon petitioner's representation dated 05.11.2025 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jothiraj 1/5

For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.A.Kannan, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent herein to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation dated 05.11.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's power agent forged a life certificate, which was not signed by the petitioner and illegally executed three sale deeds in favour of one A. Arunachalam and received a sum of Rs.35,00,000/- as sale consideration in his account. Hence, the petitioner made a representation to the second respondent. However, no action has been taken by the respondents till date. He would further submit that the petitioner has already lodged a complaint in this regard before the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-II, Pudukkottai District, and summons have also been issued in the said complaint.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the present case relates to alleged forgery 2/5

and that the petitioner has to approach the criminal Court under criminal law.

4. Since the petitioner has already lodged a police complaint with regard to the alleged forgery of the life certificate, once again giving a representation to the official respondents would not arise at all. The Registrar cannot be directed to decide about the ownership of the property by conducting enquiry under Section 77A of the Registration Act. It is only for the competent Civil Court to decide. The Police have already taken cognizance of the complaint and have also issued summons to the accused persons. This Court, therefore, does not find it necessary to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-II, Pudukkottai District, is directed to investigate the case and proceed in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above, this Court finds no merit in this Writ Petition and the same stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

04.12.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No TSG 3/5

To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Rd, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, Office of Pudukkottai District Registration, PWD Campus, Pudukkottai Head Office, Pudukkottai - 622 001.

3. The Sub Registrar, Office of Pudukkottai Sub Registration, PWD Campus, Pudukkottai Head Office, Pudukkottai - 622 001.

4. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-II, Pudukkottai Distrit.

4/5

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

TSG W.P.(MD)No.34997 of 2025 04.12.2025 5/5