A.Mohamed Akbar Ali v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

1. A.Mohamed Akbar Ali,

2. M.Mohamed Imran Khan,

3. H.Akkim @ Hakkim

4. H.Jahankeer,

5. M.Sarbudeen, ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, R.S.Mangalam Taluk, Ramanathapuram District (Cr.No.187 of 2025).

2. M. Ribaya Begam, ... Respondents PRAYER :-This petition under section 528 BNSS, to call for the records in STC No.494/2025 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai and quash the same as devoid of merits. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Atham Ali, For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr.Mr.I.Kalantar Aasik Ahamedu for R2 1/4

ORDER

The petitioners sought for quashing of the final report registered for the alleged offences under Sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2), 74, 351(2) BNS (Corresponding to Sections 142, 294(b), 323, 354 and 506(ii) I.P.C).

2. The gist of the allegation is that on account of prior enmity, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant with hands and sticks and abused in filthy language and thus, committed the aforesaid offences.

3. Admittedly, the petitioners and the second respondent have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 27.11.2025.

4. The petitioners and the second respondent are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.K.Ravichandran, Special Sub Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanthapuram 2/4

District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

5. Considering the nature of the allegation and the relationship between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending prosecution. Accordingly, the impugned final report is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 27.11.2025, shall form part and parcel of the order. 28.11.2025 Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order LS To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai 2.The Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3.The Officer in-charge, Mediation and Conciliation Centre Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

SUNDER MOHAN,J LS CRL OP(MD) No.21564 of 2025 28.11.2025 4/4