← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/34055/2025allowed

M.Mahamuni v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

2025-11-25Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Mahamuni ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy, Trichy District.

2.The Tahsildar, Thiruverumbur Taluk Office, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registration Office, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Refusal Check Slip issued by the 1/5

third respondent vide No.RFL/Thiruverumbur/437/2025 dated 10.11.2025 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently directing the third respondent to register the Sale Deed presented in respect of the property comprised in S.No.99/2 situated at Sooriyur Village, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Trichy District within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mahendran For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.Sale deed dated 10.11.2025 was executed in favour of the writ petitioner. Document was presented for registration. Registration was refused and the petitioner was called upon to obtain "No Objection Certificate" from the jurisdictional Revenue Divisional Officer. Challenging the stand of the registering authority, this writ petition came to be filed.

2/5

3.It is seen that the subject property was originally assigned. The original assessee had settled the property in favour of the writ petitioner's vendor vide document dated 25.03.2025 (Document No.3253 of 2025). Subsequently, patta was also mutated in favour of the writ petitioner's vendor.

4.When no exception was taken to registration of the document in favour of the writ petitioner's vendor by the original assignee, there is no reason as to why such an objection should be raised at this point of time. The Hon'ble Division Bench of Madras High Court in the decision reported in (2010) 5 LW 289 (C.Tirumalai Gounder Vs The State of Tamil Nadu) held that when one's property had changed hands and mutation of revenue record has also been effected, the revenue authority cannot thereafter raise any objection.

5.In this view of the matter, the order impugned in this is quashed. The parties are liberty to re-present the document. It shall be registered and released subject to the fulfilment of the other usual formalities. 3/5

6.This Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. 25.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy, Trichy District.

2.The Tahsildar, Thiruverumbur Taluk Office, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registration Office, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

4/5

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

MGA 25.11.2025 5/5