← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21949/2025allowed

Suji @ Suji Paulin v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, C-3 Ss Colony

2025-11-28Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21949 of 2025 1.Suji @ Suji Paulin 2.Sam @ Sam Jeffry Srinivasagam 3.Mercy Grace 4.Mahesh 5.Biju Balan ... Petitioners / Accused No.1 to 5 Vs.

1.The State of Tamilnadu rep. by, The Inspector of Police, C-3 S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City.

Crime No.607 of 2025 ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Jeyasekaran ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code/Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.607 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent Police and quash the same as illegal.

1/4

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Gopinath For R-1 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R-2 : M/s.K.Shahinsha

ORDER

The petitioners seek to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.607 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent Police, which was filed for the offences under Section 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 127, 296(b), 351(3) of BNS.

2. The allegation in the impugned FIR is that first petitioner had a love affair with the son of the defacto complainant and due to misunderstanding between them, there was a wordy altercation and subsequently, the petitioners had attacked the defacto complainant and his family members and caused injuries to them, abused them in filthy language and thus committed the aforesaid offences.

3. Admittedly, the petitioners and the second respondent have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 27.11.2025. 2/4

4. The petitioners and the second respondent are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.A.Murugan, Sub Inspector of Police, C-3 S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

5. In view of the same and considering the nature of the offences, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the impugned final report pending investigation. Accordingly, the impugned FIR in Crime.No.607 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent Police, is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 27.11.2025 shall form part of this order. The petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as costs to the High Court Legal Services Authority attached to this Bench forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 28.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Indu 3/4

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

Indu To 1.The Inspector of Police, C-3 S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P(MD).No.21949 of 2025 28.11.2025 4/4