← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/1403/2025dismissed

M.Ramakrishnan v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2025-12-01Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA M.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner -vs1.The Director General of Police, Tamilnadu, Chennai.

2.The Inspector General of Police, Southern Region, Race Course Road, Madurai.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Theni-Dindigul Region, Trichy Road, Dindigul.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, The Superintendent of Police Office, Dindigul.

5.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District.

6.A.Gunasekaran ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to produce the petitioner's wife Priyadarshini before this Court as alive or produce her body before this Court.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Narayanan For R1 to R5 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed for a direction directing the respondents 1 to 5 to produce the petitioner's wife Priyadarshini before this Court.

2. On a perusal of the complaint lodged by the petitioner reveals that the petitioner married one G.Priyadarshini on 27.08.2025,

who is the daughter of the sixth respondent herein and due to some misunderstanding, his wife went to her parents house and she did not pick his phone and she is acting with the ill-advise of her parents and hence, he has filed the present habeas corpus petition.

3. The facts stated in the petition shows that due to misunderstanding between the parties, the wife of the petitioner left the matrimonial home. In view of the above, we find no illegal detention in this case since there is a misunderstanding between the husband and wife. Hence, this habeas corpus petition is not maintainable and it is dismissed. The petitioner has to approach the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

[G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.] 01.12.2025 am NCC :Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

To 1.The Director General of Police, Tamilnadu, Chennai.

2.The Inspector General of Police, Southern Region, Race Course Road, Madurai.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Theni-Dindigul Region, Trichy Road, Dindigul.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, The Superintendent of Police Office, Dindigul.

5.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District.

6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.

AND R. POORNIMA,J.

am 01.12.2025