Aathik Rahman @ Adhik Rahman v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Devipattinam

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 04.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Aathik Rahman @ Adhik Rahman ... Petitioner Vs.

1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

Crime No.8/2024.

2.Kesavamoorthy 3.Gnanamoorthy 4.Dharmaraja ... Respondents 1/6

PRAYER :- This Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, to call for the records and quash the same in C.C.No.1131 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Palmurugan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking to quash the impugned Charge Sheet in C.C.No.1131 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, which was filed for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC.

2. The gist of the allegations in the final report is that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner was driving the two wheeler in a rash and negligent manner. Therefore, the respondents 2 to 4 questioned him and advised him. In the evening, the petitioner and others came to the defacto 2/6

complainants village and abused filthy language and assaulted them. Hence, the present complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a case and counter case and the parties have since arrived at a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 04.12.2025.

4. The petitioner and the respondents 2 to 4 are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.Tharmalingam, SSI, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

5. Considering the nature of allegation and the relationship between the parties, this Court in view of the fact that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending trial. Accordingly, the impugned Charge Sheet in C.C.No.1131 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, is hereby quashed and the Criminal Original 3/6

Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 04.12.2025 shall form part and parcel of the order.

04.12.2025 Index: Yes/ No Internet:Yes/No vsg 4/6

TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

L.VICTORIA GOWRI,J vsg CRL OP(MD) No.21900 of 2025 04.12.2025 6/6