Kesavamoorthy v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Devipattinam

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 04.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI 1.Kesavamoorthy 2.Gnanamoorthy 3.Dharmaraja ... Petitioners Vs.

1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

Crime No.9/2024.

2.Aathik Rahman ... Respondents 1/6

PRAYER :- This Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, to call for the records and quash the same in C.C.No.930 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Yasar Arafath For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking to quash the impugned Charge Sheet in C.C.No.930 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, which was filed for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC.

2. The gist of the allegations in the final report is that on the date of occurrence, the defacto complainant went to the Ponkulam Bus Stop, at that time, a wordy quarrel arose between the defacto complainant's village people and Ponkulam Village People. When the defacto complainant stopped his two wheeler to see the problem, the first 2/6

petitioner picked up the two wheeler key, abused in filthy language and assaulted him and sustained injuries and thus, committed the aforesaid offences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the parties have since arrived at a compromise and decided to give quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 04.12.2025.

4. The petitioners and the second respondent are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.Tharmalingam, SSI, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

5. Considering the nature of allegation and the relationship between the parties, this Court in view of the fact that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending trial. Accordingly, the impugned Charge Sheet in C.C.No.930 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, 3/6

Ramanathapuram District, is hereby quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 04.12.2025 shall form part and parcel of the order.

04.12.2025 Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order vsg 4/6

TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

L.VICTORIA GOWRI,J vsg CRL OP(MD) No.22002 of 2025 04.12.2025 6/6