← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/35015/2025dismissed

S.Ravichandran, v. The District Collector,

2025-12-04Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Ravichandran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul - 624 004.

2.The Tahsildar, Athoor Taluk, Athoor, Dindigul District - 624 701.

3.The Block Development Officer, Athoor Panchayat Union, (Office at Sempatti), Dindigul District - 624 707.

4.Nagappan 5.Veerapandi 6.N.Veeramani 7.A.Thangavel 1/6

8.M.Sethumadhavan 9.Kariyakkal 10.Muthammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 4 to 10 in the public water body - Venkatasamynaickenkulam (Pond) inS.No.236 and feeder channels (Odai) situate in S.Nos.250/1 and 251 and water course and cart track in Survey No.236/1A and 236/2A in Ambathurai Village, Aathoor Taluk, Dindigul District and to restore them to its original position free from any encroachments. For Petitioner : Mr.J.S.Murali For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santosh, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2.

Mr.M.Siddharthan, Addl. Government Pleader for R3.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleaders for the respondents 1 to 3. Issuance of notice tot he respondents 4 to 10 is dispensed with. 2/6

2.This writ petition cannot be entertained. This is because the petitioner had already filed W.P.(MD)No.21694 of 2022 for the very same relief. The said writ petition was disposed of on 14.09.2022 in the following terms:- "8.In view of the above submission and also considering the limited scope of the relief sought for, this Court, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, directs the respondents 1 to 3, to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.02.2021 in the light of the orders passed by the Block Development Officer, Athoor Panchayat Union, Dindigul District, dated 12.03.2021 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due notice to all the parties concerned, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

3.When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that pursuant to the direction given in the earlier writ petition, survey was conducted and encroachments were also removed. On direction from us, copy of the instructions given to the learned Additional Government Pleader has also been served on the learned counsel for the petitioner. If the petitioner is 3/6

still aggrieved, the only remedy open to the petitioner to file a contempt petition.

4.With the aforesaid observation and liberty, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

(G.R.S.J.,) & (B.P.J.,) 04.12.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul - 624 004.

2.The Tahsildar, Athoor Taluk, Athoor, Dindigul District - 624 701.

3.The Block Development Officer, Athoor Panchayat Union, (Office at Sempatti), Dindigul District - 624 707.

4/6

5/6

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

and B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ias 04.12.2025 6/6