Tajunnisa Begum v. S.Nagore Ghani

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR 1.Tajunnisa Begum 2.Minor.L.Osama 3.Minor.K.Abdul (minor petitioners 2 &3 represented by their mother 1st petitioner) ... Petitioners Vs.

1.S.Nagore Ghani 2.Rashida Begum 3.N.Fathima 4.N.Muthu 5.Minor N.Nisha 6.Minor N.Shahul Hameed 1/5

7.Amir Ghani 8.Mookkammal 9.Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Jeevan Prakash, Gandhiji Road, Thanjavur.

10.Life Insurance Corporation of India, Unit II, Madurai Road, Tiruchirappalli-620 001.

11.Indian Overseas Bank, Vayalur Road Branch, Trichirappalli.

12.Indian Overseas Bank, Main Guard Branch, Trichirappalli.

13.Vijya Bank, Salai Road Branch, Trichirappalli.

14.Bank of Maharashtra, Chinnakadai Street Branch, Trichirappalli.

15.John Moses 16.Sumi Colour Galaxy No.153, ARV Complex, Salai Road, Trichirappalli.

17.Reliable Gas Services, NO.10E/3, Sastri Road, Tennur, 2/5

Trichy-17, By its partners, APK Moorthy and APK Ashok 18.M/s.T.T.K.Prestige Limited, K.S.R.Building, Ramamoorthy Nagar, Chinthamani, Trichirappalli-620 002.

19.Victor 20.Masi 21.Muthu Kamanghyakanpalayam Village, Sirugamani Post, Tiruchirppalli District.

22.Pitchaiammal 23.Pattayadar 24.Periyasamy 25.Mayavan 26.Alagesan 27.Prakash

...Respondents

Prayer in C.M.P.(MD)No.19847 of 2025: Condone delay filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying this Court to condone the delay of 109 days in filing the present review application before this Court against the order passed in A.S. (MD)No.90 of 2013, dated 15.07.2025.

3/5

Prayer in Rev.Aplc(MD)SR.104749 of 2025: The review application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC, to review the order dated 15.07.2025 in A.S.(MD)No.90 of 2013 and allow the same. For Petitioner :Mr.J.M.Hassanul Bazari For Respondents :Mr.J.Anand Kumar for R1 to R8 : Mr.C.Godwin for R9 & R10

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Though at the stage of the condone delay petition, the Court is not expected to go into the merits of the matter, we are of the view that there is zero merit in the review application. C.M.P.(MD)No.19847 of 2025 stands dismissed. Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR.No.104749 of 2025 is rejected at the SR stage. [G.R.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 28.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi 4/5

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and K.RAJASEKAR, J.

rmi 28.01.2026 5/5