Sivasakthi v. State Of Tamilnadu, Rep By Its The Superintendent Of Police
CRL OP(MD) NO. 23021 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25-02-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL OP(MD) NO. 23021 of 2025 Sivasakthi Petitioner Vs
1. State of Tamilnadu, rep by its The Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli District
2. The Inspector of Police The District Crime Branch Tirunelveli District
3. The Inspector of Police Valliyur Police Station Tirunelveli District
4. Ramu Ammal
5. Krishnan
6. Praveen Kumar 7.Selvan Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s):
Mr. P.M. Vishnuvarthanan For Respondent 1 to 3:
Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(Criminal Side) Prayer:
C-41D.To issue a Direction directing the 2 and 3 respondents to Not to Harass the petitioner on alleged complaints given by Ramu Ammal ie., 4th respondent and Praveen Kumar ie., 6th https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondent, by not to interfere with the civil dispute on the basis
ORDER
Today the matter came up for hearing under the caption "for being mentioned".
2. Paragraph No. 5 (a) has to be altered as follows: "(a) If any complaint is received against the petitioners, the respondent-police shall issue written summons/notice under Section 62 Cr.P.C., 1973 / 64 BNSS, 2023, specifying the date, time, and purpose of enquiry. Oral or informal summons are prohibited."
3. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary corrections and issue fresh order copy. 25-02-2026 Sml https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis