← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22406/2025granted

Maharaja v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Kalakkad

2025-12-08Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08.12.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.22406 of 2025 Maharaja ... Petitioner /Accused No.4

Versus

The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Kalakkad Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.749 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.749 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 352 and 353(1)(b) of the BNS, 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police received information that the accused persons, belonging to a backward community, had uploaded a social media status containing a video with audio in which they were seen standing together, praising their community, and issuing threats to other communities. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that, during the course of investigation, the accused persons had deleted the video clip containing the alleged threats 2/6

to other communities.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, and noting that the alleged video clip has already been deleted, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, this Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

3/6

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. He has to co-operate for the investigation;

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.

(S S Y J) 08.12.2025 pal 4/6

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kalakkad Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J.

pal

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22406 of 2025 Date : 08.12.2025 6/6