← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22399/2025granted

Karthick @ Sethukarthick v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sayalkudi

2025-12-08Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08.12.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.22399 of 2025

1. Karthick @ Sethukarthick 2.Rajakani ... Petitioners /A1 & A2

Versus

The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.247 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.M.Pandian For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.247 of 2025 on the file of the 1/6

respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 (corresponding provisions under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of IPC), seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity regarding house construction boundaries, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant with their hands and a sickle, thereby causing bleeding injuries. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the injured has been discharged from 2/6

the hospital.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

3/6

(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. They have to co-operate for the investigation;

(c) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and (f) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.

(S S Y J) 08.12.2025 pal 4/6

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J.

pal

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22399 of 2025 Date : 08.12.2025 6/6