King Natural Extracts, v. Hathiram Traders,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ CRL.R.C.(MD)Nos.1565 & 1566 of 2025 King Natural Extracts, Rep. by its Proprietor Indumathi W/o. I.K. Ramasubramanian Door No. 361, Thiruvananthapuram Street Rajapalayam Town Virudhunagar District.
... Petitioner in both cases vs.
Hathiram Traders, Rep. by its Proprietor A. Ragusankar S/o. Arjunaraja Door No. 153B/106 Madasamy Kovil Street Rajapalayam Town Virudhunagar District.
... Respondent in both cases PRAYER in Crl.RC(MD).No.1565 of 2025: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, 2023, To call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed in Cr.M.P. No. 3772 of 2025 in C.A. No. 189 of 2023 by the Learned Principal District and Session Judge, Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar District dt. 14.11.2025 and set aside the same and consequently to direct the Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Srivilliputtur to accept Rs.9,20,000/- is 20% to cheque alleged amount to the tune of 46,00,000/- in STC.No.242 of 2023 (on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Srivilliputtur). 1/5
PRAYER in Crl.RC(MD).No.1566 of 2025: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, 2023, To call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed in Cr.M.P. No. 3761 of 2025 in C.A. No. 188 of 2023 by the Learned Principal District and Session Judge, Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar District dt. 13.11.2025 and set aside the same and consequently to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Srivilliputhur to accept Rs.1,00,000/- is 20% to cheque alleged amount to the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- in STC.No. 394 of 2023 (on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Srivilliputhur).
(In both the cases) For Petitioner : Mr.Kannan Gurusami For Respondent : No appearance ***** C O M M O N O R D E R Heard Mr.Kanna Gurusami, learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner.
2/5
2. These Criminal Revision Petitions have been filed to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.3772 & 3761 of 2025 in Crl.A.Nos.188 & 189 of 2023 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Srivilliputhur, dated 13.11.2025 & 14.11.2025 respectively. 3.When the matters were taken up for hearing, Mr.Kannan Gurusami, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, was informed that the challenge in the revision petitions are to interlocutory/revisable orders passed by the trial court, and therefore, it may not be appropriate to invoke the revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 of the Cr.P.C.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner would then seek liberty to file a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., and the revision petitioner does not propose to press the Criminal Revision Petitions and seeks to withdraw the same. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the affidavit filed in support of these Criminal Revision Petitions.
Girish Kumar Suneja vs. CBI, AIR 2017 SC 3620 3/5
4. In view of the submissions and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner, these Criminal Revision Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. Index :Yes / No 10.12.2025 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No gvn Note :
i) Issue order copy on 11.12.2025.
ii) Registry is directed to return the original impugned order to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, if any, after securing photo copy of the impugned order.
To:
1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Srivilliputhur.
2. The Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Srivilliputtur
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ , J.
gvn Common order made in 10.12.2025 5/5