Manobala v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By Its,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10.12.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.22649 of 2025

1. Manobala

2. Anantharaj ... Petitioners/ Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Kuruvikulam Police Station, Tenkasi District.

(Crime No.546 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.J.Krishnakannan For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.546 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) and 249 of BNS Act 2023, in Crime No. 546 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. The petitioner had inadvertently omitted Section 249 of the BNS Act, 2023, and the same is hereby incorporated.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 04.11.2025 at around 2.30 p.m., the defacto complainant went to Podhigai Nagar after receiving a call from the first accused. Thereafter, the accused persons attacked the defacto complainant on the right side of his head with an iron/wooden stick, causing a bleeding injury. The accused then allegedly robbed him of his silver hand chain and silver neck chain. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody from 13.11.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

2/6

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are serious in nature. He further submitted that some of the articles have been recovered and that one previous case is pending against the first petitioner. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card 3/6

or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter, as and when required for investigation. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 10.12.2025 jbr 4/6

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil.

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kuruvikulam Police Station, Tenkasi District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J.

jbr

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22649 of 2025 Date : 10.12.2025 6/6