← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23568/2025dismissed

Nahoorammal v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its

2025-12-18Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18.12.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY C.R.L. O.P.(MD).No.23568 of 2025 Nahoorammal ..Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its the Inspector of Police, Thiruppathur Town Police Station, Sivagangai District.

(Cr.No.535 of 2025) .. Respondent/Complainant For petitioner : Mr.Gopalakrishna Lakshmana Raju Senior Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate(crl.side) PETITION FOR Anticipatory BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.535 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.

1/4

ORDER : This Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) of B.N.S. Act and 34 of National Medical Commission Act, in Cr.No.535 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is not having any valid qualification for providing treatment under the medical commission Act. IN this situation, the petitioner conducted the abortion to one female. Thereafter, she went to Government Hospital for further treatment. The above said woman was enquired by the medical officials at that time, she told that the primary treatment was given by the petitioner. Hence, this case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offence and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent submitted that the investigation is at initial stage and if the petitioner is released on bail, 2/4

she may abscond. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the nature of the offence committed by the petitioner and considering that the investigation is still pending, if the petitioner is released on bail, she may tamper the witnesses and abscond. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 18.12.2025 RJR To

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppathur.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruppathur Town Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY, J., RJR CRL OP(MD)No.23568 of 2025 18.12.2025 4/4