← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23552/2025dismissed

Kilbert v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By

2026-01-07Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Kilbert, S/o. Muthaiyan, ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By, the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Colachel, Kanykumari District.

(Crime No. 47 of 2025).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. Mohamed Haneef.A.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS 1/4

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 47 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 13 and 14 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000, in Crime No.47 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail,

2. The case of the prosecution is that while the defacto complainant's daughter was taking a bath in the bathroom of her house, the petitioner recorded a video using his mobile phone. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is 2/4

ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has involved in very serious offence and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he objected to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has involved in very serious offence and the investigation is at initial stage. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. (S S Y J) 07.01.2026 tta TO 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Colachel, Kanykumari District

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY,J tta

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23552 of 2025 Date : 07/01/2026 4/4