S. Maideen Abdul Khader v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09/01/2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.23558 of 2025
1. S.Maideen Abdul Khader
2. Mytheen Kasali
3. S.Nallamohamad ... Petitioners Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Tharuvaikulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
(Crime No.189 of 2025).
... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 189 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6
ORDER
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, in Crime No.189 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to the property dispute, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted her and also threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution, and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioners.
2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioners have no previous cases. He further submitted that the investigation is yet to be completed. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their 3/6
photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of one week and thereafter, as and when required; [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and 4/6
[f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
09.01.2026 CP TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi.
2.The Inspector of Police, Tharuvaikulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J CP
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.23558 of 2025 Date : 09/01/2026 6/6