Vimal Raj @ Vimal v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/12/2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Vimal Raj @ Vimal, S/o. Rajasekar, ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By, the Inspector of Police, Vallam Police Station, Vallam, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No. 106 of 2025). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr. Pragalathan.N., For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 106 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. 1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 103, 61(2)(a) of BNS, in Crime No.106 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with the other accused attacked the deceased with wooden log and caused severe injuries to him and thereafter, he died. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that based the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case and he is in judicial custody from 04.04.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation is still pending and also submitted that the petitioner along 2/6

with the other accused attacked the deceased with deadly weapon and caused severe injuries to him and thereafter, he died. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner as well as considering the age of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District, that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.,until further orders. 3/6

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) tta 18.12.2025 4/6

TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Trichy, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Vallam Police Station, Vallam, Thanjavur District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J tta

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23590 of 2025 Date : 18/12/2025 6/6