← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23848/2025dismissed

Indrani v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2026-01-02Honourable Mrs Justice L.Victoria Gowri5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Indrani ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs.

1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

Crime No.174 of 2025.

.. Respondents/Complainants Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to transfer the case in Crime No.174 of 2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent or other investigation agency and further direct them to investigate and to file final report within the time stipulated by this Court.

1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking to transfer the case in Crime No.174 of 2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent or other investigation agency and further direct them to investigate and to file final report within the time stipulated by this Court.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that the matter is all about a case and case in counter between the defacto complainant and one Murugan, Ramesh Kannan, Maheshwari, Malaisamy and Suseela. All the persons are accused in Crime No.174 of 2025 dated 21.06.2025 and are the relatives of the daughter of the petitioner herein. However, after investigation, the investigation officer had concluded the same as 2/5

'mistake of fact' by recording that the petitioner had given a complaint with exaggerated version and the matter is between family members.

3. For which, the learned counsel for the petitioner categorically contended that the petitioner is a senior citizen who suffered a head injury.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) had very promptly placed a copy of Accident Register before this Court. On perusal of the same, it could be understood that the petitioner had suffered no external injuries.

5. Hence, recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to file a protest petition before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

02.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No gbg 3/5

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

gbg 02.01.2026 5/5