Munavvar Sulthana v. The District Collector
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.36737 of 2025 Munavvar Sulthana ... Petitioner Vs
1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai - 625 020.
2. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai - 625 020.
3. The District Registrar, Madurai South Registration District, 171, Palace Road, Madurai - 625 001.
4. The Sub-Registrar, Sholavandan Sub-Registrar Office, Sholavandan, Madurai District.
5. R.Giri
6. S.Mani ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent herein to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 and 6, u/s. 82 and 83 1/4
of the Registration Act 1908, for their wrong and false statement for registering a Document No.672/2024, dated 03.04.2024 based on the representation dated 01.11.2025 within a stipulated time frame that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sriram For Respondents : Mr.V.Om Prakash, Govt. Advocate for R1 to R4 Mr.R.Prasanna for R5 No Appearance for R6
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the 4th respondent herein to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 and 6 under Sections 82 and 83 of the Registration Act 1908, for their wrong and false statement for registering a Document No.672/2024, dated 03.04.2024 based on the representation dated 01.11.2025 within a stipulated time frame that may be fixed by this Court.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already sent a representation on 01.11.2025, seeking to take action against the respondents 5 and 6 under 2/4
Sections 82 and 83 of the Registration Act 1908, for their wrong and false statement for registering a Document No.672/2024, dated 03.04.2024. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 01.11.2025 would be considered in accordance with law.
4. In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the third respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 01.11.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the parties concerned, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Vsm 19.02.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No 3/4
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
vsm To
1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai - 625 020.
2. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai - 625 020.
3. The District Registrar, Madurai South Registration District, 171, Palace Road, Madurai - 625 001.
4. The Sub-Registrar, Sholavandan Sub-Registrar Office, Sholavandan, Madurai District.
W.P.(MD)No.36737 of 2025 19.02.2026 4/4